ENACTED LEGISLATION
ILLINOIS: Illinois amends social media privacy law
Summary: Illinois amended its Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act to make it unlawful for an employer or prospective employer to request or require an employee or applicant to authenticate or access a personal online account in the presence of the employer, to request or require that an employee or applicant invite the employer to join a group affiliated with any personal online account of the employee or applicant or to join an online account established by the employer. 
Impact(s): Illinois employers
View source document

LOUISIANA: Louisiana enacts law regarding job reference liability
Summary: Louisiana enacted a law to provide that an employer, contractor, premises owner or other third party shall not be subject to a cause of action for negligent hiring or failing to adequately supervise an offender certified to be employed due to injuries caused by that employee or independent contractor based solely on that individual’s previous criminal conviction.
Impact(s): Louisiana employers
View source document

RHODE ISLAND: Rhode Island amends Certification of Child Care and Youth Serving Agency Workers law
Summary: Rhode Island has amended the Certification of Child Care and Youth Serving Agency Workers law to allow the Department of Children, Youth and Families to conduct criminal records checks.
Impact(s): Rhode Island child care facilities
View source document
 
PROPOSED LEGISLATION
NEW YORK CITY: New York City proposes law to prohibit employers from requesting salary history from job applicants
Summary: The New York City Public Advocate has announced a bill that prohibits employers from requesting salary history from job applicants. The legislation will make it illegal for any employer or employment agency to inquire about an applicant’s salary history including benefits.  This includes searching publicly available records and reports. The bill would also make it illegal for an employer to rely on salary history when determining the salary of an applicant.
Impact(s): New York City employers
View source document
 
COURT OPINIONS
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT: Court of Appeals certifies three questions regarding a provision of the New York Human Rights Law and denial of employment on the basis of criminal conviction 
Summary: The Second Circuit certified three questions to the New York State Court of Appeals. The claim involves two convicted sex offender who were fired from their jobs after a background check revealed criminal histories. They sued their direct employer, a company which had an agency relationship with their employer, and the agency’s parent company. The District Court granted summary judgment and found the New York Human Rights Law applied only to the direct employer. The questions before the court are whether the New York Human Rights Law’s criminal conviction provisions apply only to “employers,” what is the scope or definition of the term “employer” and whether a non-employer can be liable under the NY Human Rights Law’s “aider and abettor” provision. 
Impact(s): New York employers, employment agencies and contractors
View source document

U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE: Employee terminated for positive drug test has no basis for employment discrimination claim
Summary: A court dismissed an employee’s disability and discrimination action arising from her termination after a positive drug test. The employee exhibited erratic behavior at work and her employer ordered her to submit to a reasonable suspicion drug screen. The employee tested positive for prescription drugs for which she did not have a prescription and her employment was terminated. She subsequently sued her employer alleging claims for disability and age discrimination. Her employer filed for summary judgment and the court found that she failed to establish a case for age or disability discrimination.  
Impact(s): Drug screening compliance – for general legal review
View source document
 
OTHER UPDATES
FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT: Waffle House files intent to appeal in background check lawsuit
Summary: Waffle House filed an intent to appeal a judge’s order refusing to dismiss an FCRA proposed class action alleging Waffle House conducted background checks using public data without properly informing applicants. Waffle House will file the appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Impact(s): FCRA compliance – for general legal review
View source document

FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT: Plaintiffs file motion to oppose dismissal of proposed FCRA class-action lawsuit against Petco
Summary: Plaintiffs in a proposed FCRA class action lawsuit against Petco filed an opposition motion to Petco’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff’s motion states that Petco’s FCRA disclosure contains “reams of extraneous information beyond the required consumer report disclosure,” in violation of the FCRA’s “stand-alone” requirement.
Impact(s): FCRA compliance – for general legal review
View source document
 

This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

© 2016 Truescreen, Inc. All Rights Reserved.