Summary: A federal district court in Minnesota denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss in an FCRA class-action lawsuit agreeing that the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a violation of the FCRA based on extraneous information in the defendant’s disclosure and sufficiently alleged a knowing violation of the FCRA. |
Impact(s): FCRA compliance – for general legal review |
Summary: A federal judge granted Target’s motion to dismiss a class-action suit alleging that Target violated the FCRA for including extraneous information in an employee background check disclosure. The court concluded that the alleged violation was not willful. Citing the dearth of guidance from the federal courts of appeal and the FTC, as well as the less-than-clear text of the FCRA’s stand-alone disclosure requirement, the court concluded, as a matter of law, that Target did not willfully fail to comply with the FCRA. The court granted Target’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. |
Impact(s): FCRA compliance – for general legal review |