ENACTED LEGISLATION
NEW JERSEY: NJ DOL publishes “Ban the Box” regulations 
Summary: The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development has published final “Ban the Box” regulations which clarify New Jersey’s Opportunity to Compete Act.
Impact(s): New Jersey employers
View source document
 
PROPOSED LEGISLATION
NEW JERSEY: New Jersey proposes legislation to prohibit practice of requiring credit check as condition of employment
Summary: On December 14, the New Jersey Assembly Labor Committee passed three companion bills (S.524/A.2310/A.2298) that would limit employer use of credit. The bills prohibit the use of credit by employers when screening applicants, with the exception of a managerial position; a position involving access to customers’, employees’ or employers’ personal belongings or financial information; a position involving a fiduciary responsibility; a position which provides access to an expense account; or a law enforcement officer. 
Impact(s): New Jersey employers
View source document
 
COURT OPINIONS
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: Court denies motion to dismiss in FCRA case involving state law notices in background check disclosure
Summary: The plaintiff alleged the defendant’s background check disclosure violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act because it included notices regarding background checks required under state law. The court declined to dismiss the Plaintiff’s claim at the pleading stage, finding the existence of these state law notices could constitute a willful violation of the FCRA.
Impact(s): FCRA compliance – for general legal review
View source document

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA: Court rules ban that blocks those with criminal records from working with elderly is unconstitutional
Summary: A Commonwealth court panel ruled that a ban that blocks those with certain criminal records from working with the elderly is unconstitutional. The court held that the lifetime employment ban contained in Section 503(a) of the Older Adults Protective Services Act, 35 P.S. §10225.503(a), violates due process guaranteed by the Pennsylvania Constitution because it goes beyond the necessities of the case and is not substantially related to the Act’s stated objective of protecting older adults. The court reached this conclusion based on the Act allowing some individuals with disqualifying convictions to continue working for a facility if they had been with that facility for over a year before July 1, 1998. The court also noted that the lifetime ban is not specific enough, and lacks fine-tuning because it treats all the enumerated crimes, regardless of their vintage or severity, as the same even though they present very different risks of employment.
Impact(s): Pennsylvania healthcare facilities
View source document
 

This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

© 2016 Truescreen, Inc. All Rights Reserved.