ENACTED LEGISLATION
COLUMBUS, OHIO: Salary History Inquiries Prohibited
Summary: Effective March 1, 2024, the City of Columbus, Ohio will ban employers from inquiring into an applicant's salary history. The ordinance is applicable to all employers located within the City of Columbus that employ at least 15 individuals within the city.

The ordinance will prohibit an employer from asking an applicant about their current or prior wages, benefits or other compensation, rely on the applicant's salary history in deciding whether to make an offer of employment or in determining wages and benefits for the applicant, refusing employment if an applicant declines to disclose their salary history.

The ordinance will not apply to circumstances where: federal, state, or local law specifically authorizes an employer to rely on salary history to determine wages; there is an internal transfer or promotion of an employee; an applicant voluntarily discloses their salary history; a background check discloses salary history as long as the employer does not use that information solely in determining compensation; or an applicant who is rehired within three years of the date of termination, and federal, state and local government employees in the City of Columbus.

Impact(s): All Columbus, Ohio employers
View source document

IDAHO: Clean Slate Act passed
Summary: Effective January 1, 2024, The Clean Slate Act will allow individuals with relatively minor non-violent, non-sexual offenses to petition for sealing of their public records provided they have gone at least five years since the completion of the sentence without any subsequent offenses. If subsequent criminal offenses are committed, the disclosure exemption will be revoked.
Impact(s): All Idaho employers
View source document
OTHER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: General Motors Agrees To $365,000 Fine To Settle Discrimination Allegations
Summary: On April 18, 2023 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it had reached a settlement with General Motors (GM) to resolve allegations of discrimination in the Form I-9 completion process. DOJ alleged that GM required employees to present an unexpired foreign passport as part of the Form I-9 completion process, ostensibly in an effort to comply with its export control regulations.

Several statutes control the release of data to non-U.S. persons. Some foreign nationals, due to their country of citizenship, are barred from possessing certain information and others require the employer to apply for an export license to be able to possess certain information. The export control regime thus requires employers to conduct a proper export control and screening assessment during the hiring and onboarding process.

However, as demonstrated by the settlement, the export control and screening assessment cannot be combined with the Form I-9 completion process due to the Immigration and Nationality Act's (INA) prohibition on asking for certain documents from the employee. Federal law allows workers to choose which valid, legally acceptable documentation to present to demonstrate their identity and permission to work.

To assist employers in reconciling these conflicting regulations the DOJ provided a fact sheet for employers. This topic has also been the subject of prior Technical Assistance Letters (TAL) by DOJ.

Impact(s): All employers
View settlement agreement
View U.S. DOJ Letter - 2016
View U.S. DOJ Letter - 2013
View U.S. DOJ Letter - 2010

This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

© 2023 Truescreen, Inc. All Rights Reserved.