ENACTED LEGISLATION
GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA: "Fair Chance Hiring" Ordinance Passed
Summary: In December 2022, the city passed a "Ban the Box" law prohibiting employers with 15 or more staff members from asking questions about criminal history during the application process.

While questions about criminal history during the application process are generally impermissible, employers are permitted to conduct a criminal background check once a conditional job offer has been made. However, employers may only take "adverse action" based on an applicant's criminal history if the applicant is deemed unsuitable for the position based on an "individual assessment."

If adverse action is taken based on the subject's criminal history, the employer is required to give the subject:

  • a written copy of the decision;
  • a copy of the report; and
  • an opportunity to offer information/context about the criminal history and/or any related rehabilitation.

It is important to note that the following statement must be included in the written notice to an applicant:

"This notice is provided in accordance with the City of Gainesville Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14.5, Section 14.5-181, which regulates the process and timing of criminal background checks conducted on job applicants."

Violations of the ordinance carry a potential civil penalty of $500. Half of all recovered penalties will be awarded to the complainant.

Impact(s): All Gainesville, Florida employers
View source document
PROPOSED LEGISLATION
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Rule Change involving New Hampshire Child Care laws
Summary: New Hampshire has revoked its prior practice which afforded waivers to child care employees, permitting new staff to start working immediately provided they are accompanied by a vetted employee when in the presence of a child. Employers must receive the results of a background check before allowing staff to begin working.
Impact(s): All New Hampshire employers of minor services
View source document
OTHER
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA: Job Offer Rescission for Positive Marijuana Test Puts Pennsylvania Steelmaker Under Fire
Summary: Plaintiff John DellaVecchio claims a steelmaker-employer rescinded his job offer solely based on a positive drug test for marijuana.

The plaintiff informed the employer of his medical marijuana prescription and provided them with a copy of his medical card. A month after the administration of a pre-employment drug test, the employer informed plaintiff that a positive drug test result for marijuana violated company policy and withdrew the job offer. He was given no other reason for the refusal to hire.

The complainant seeks a jury trial against his former prospective employer to argue discrimination; the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act prohibits employers from refusing to hire an individual based solely on their medical marijuana use. The suit seeks relief against the company in the form of back wages, lost benefits, and more than $150,000 in compensatory damages.

Impact(s): All employers
View source document

This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

© 2023 Truescreen, Inc. All Rights Reserved.