ENACTED LEGISLATION
RHODE ISLAND: Guidance Issued By Rhode Island Supreme Court On Expungement Laws
Summary: The newly implemented law offers guidance on expunging marijuana records in compliance with the legalization law that was enacted in 2022.

An executive order issued by the State Supreme Court Chief Justice describes the procedures and policies involved in determining which records qualify for expungement. This includes investigating specific violations for misdemeanor and felony-level cases.

The Traffic Tribunal, the Superior Courts and District Courts will be responsible for determining which cases qualify for expungement and will also manage the sealing process. Expungement is not automatic; Individuals seeking expungement must file a request with the Clerk's Office in all three agencies either in person or through email. It is anticipated that these expungements should affect nearly 27,000 individuals with convictions solely involving marijuana possession and thousands more who have cannabis convictions on their criminal records. Once a record has been expunged, the record (and any references to it) are no longer available for public view.

Courts are required to submit cases to the Attorney General's office for review prior to expunging petitioned convictions. Civil cases must be reviewed by the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles before receiving expungement.

Impact(s): All Rhode Island employers
View source document
OTHER
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY: Scrutiny Into PA CHRI Act Violations Results In Increase Of Lawsuits
Summary: Recently, a national company was accused of violating the Pennsylvania Criminal History Record Information Act (CHRIA), (18 Pa. C.S.A. §9125), by declining employment based on criminal histories that were unrelated to employment suitability. The plaintiffs in this case argued for a six-year discovery period, based on Pennsylvania's six-year catchall statute of limitations (42 Pa. C.S.A. § 5527(b)). The defendant countered, arguing that Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations for tortious conduct was more appropriate.

Ultimately, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey sided with the plaintiffs, ruling that affected subjects have up to six years (not two) to file claims against employers for improper use of criminal histories as described under CHRIA. The court rejected the company's argument based on the concept that "plaintiffs may bring claims [under the CHRIA] analogous to various Pennsylvania common law causes of action, more than simply those sounding in tort."

Plaintiffs who win CHRIA cases can recover actual damages. The statutory minimum is $100 per violation (plus attorneys' fees) and punitive damages range from $1,000 - $10,000 for willful violations. Additionally, CHRIA plaintiffs and others alleging damages from employment denials due to criminal background checks can seek to represent other aggrieved individuals through class cases.

Impact(s): All employers
View source document

This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

© 2023 Truescreen, Inc. All Rights Reserved.